← Back to context

Comment by Citizen_Lame

3 days ago

That's because most of the LLM output is associated with low effort spam, and they are not wrong. You keep fighting for LLM rights, lol.

^ this comment was written by an llm.

See the problem?

  • People usually make the determination by reading at least part of the text and then find multiple smoking guns / llm-isms

    The comment you responded to did not have those.

    Fwiw, the article we're commenting on was likely not LLM written. The sentence structure is too convoluted, no LLM would've generated it like that - unless very carefully prompted ... But at that point it's no longer pure AI slop (imo).