← Back to context Comment by oefrha 3 days ago By excellent do you mean bearable? macOS’s SMB stack is certainly not excellent. 5 comments oefrha Reply adi_kurian 3 days ago By bearable do you mean it exists? It's fucking shite. donatj 3 days ago Which is why I'm so angry they're killing AFP. It works so much better and is super easy to set up a server for on a Linux nine_k 3 days ago Won't the SMB implementation be sufficient to mount git commits as folders? jstanley 3 days ago No, because SMB doesn't support execute permissions. So either all your files are executable or none of them are. nine_k 3 days ago I would say that in a source code tree that represents old commits I'd like none of the files to be executable. (It would miss some commits that only change the executable bit though.)
adi_kurian 3 days ago By bearable do you mean it exists? It's fucking shite. donatj 3 days ago Which is why I'm so angry they're killing AFP. It works so much better and is super easy to set up a server for on a Linux
donatj 3 days ago Which is why I'm so angry they're killing AFP. It works so much better and is super easy to set up a server for on a Linux
nine_k 3 days ago Won't the SMB implementation be sufficient to mount git commits as folders? jstanley 3 days ago No, because SMB doesn't support execute permissions. So either all your files are executable or none of them are. nine_k 3 days ago I would say that in a source code tree that represents old commits I'd like none of the files to be executable. (It would miss some commits that only change the executable bit though.)
jstanley 3 days ago No, because SMB doesn't support execute permissions. So either all your files are executable or none of them are. nine_k 3 days ago I would say that in a source code tree that represents old commits I'd like none of the files to be executable. (It would miss some commits that only change the executable bit though.)
nine_k 3 days ago I would say that in a source code tree that represents old commits I'd like none of the files to be executable. (It would miss some commits that only change the executable bit though.)
By bearable do you mean it exists? It's fucking shite.
Which is why I'm so angry they're killing AFP. It works so much better and is super easy to set up a server for on a Linux
Won't the SMB implementation be sufficient to mount git commits as folders?
No, because SMB doesn't support execute permissions. So either all your files are executable or none of them are.
I would say that in a source code tree that represents old commits I'd like none of the files to be executable. (It would miss some commits that only change the executable bit though.)