← Back to context Comment by qcl820DV34 3 days ago The issue is that the original name, "Freenet", was repurposed for a different codebase. 14 comments qcl820DV34 Reply sanity 3 days ago Different codebase, same purpose.This isn't even the first time we did a ground-up redesign/rewrite of the Freenet codebase, we did this in 2008 with the 0.7 release. FEELmyAGI 3 days ago Neither of you get to be freenet, another project with the name predated it by a lot. and throughout the 90s many ISPs were named $PLACENAME_freenethttps://case.edu/ech/articles/c/cleveland-freenet qcl820DV34 3 days ago Repeating a bad decision does not make it any wiser. sanity 3 days ago History will be the judge, and so far it's looking very promising given our progress. 7 replies → lallysingh 3 days ago Should've called the new one Freenet 2 or Freenet NT. acheron 3 days ago Freenet 3.11 for Workgroups sanity 3 days ago Freenet++
sanity 3 days ago Different codebase, same purpose.This isn't even the first time we did a ground-up redesign/rewrite of the Freenet codebase, we did this in 2008 with the 0.7 release. FEELmyAGI 3 days ago Neither of you get to be freenet, another project with the name predated it by a lot. and throughout the 90s many ISPs were named $PLACENAME_freenethttps://case.edu/ech/articles/c/cleveland-freenet qcl820DV34 3 days ago Repeating a bad decision does not make it any wiser. sanity 3 days ago History will be the judge, and so far it's looking very promising given our progress. 7 replies → lallysingh 3 days ago Should've called the new one Freenet 2 or Freenet NT. acheron 3 days ago Freenet 3.11 for Workgroups sanity 3 days ago Freenet++
FEELmyAGI 3 days ago Neither of you get to be freenet, another project with the name predated it by a lot. and throughout the 90s many ISPs were named $PLACENAME_freenethttps://case.edu/ech/articles/c/cleveland-freenet
qcl820DV34 3 days ago Repeating a bad decision does not make it any wiser. sanity 3 days ago History will be the judge, and so far it's looking very promising given our progress. 7 replies →
sanity 3 days ago History will be the judge, and so far it's looking very promising given our progress. 7 replies →
lallysingh 3 days ago Should've called the new one Freenet 2 or Freenet NT. acheron 3 days ago Freenet 3.11 for Workgroups sanity 3 days ago Freenet++
Different codebase, same purpose.
This isn't even the first time we did a ground-up redesign/rewrite of the Freenet codebase, we did this in 2008 with the 0.7 release.
Neither of you get to be freenet, another project with the name predated it by a lot. and throughout the 90s many ISPs were named $PLACENAME_freenet
https://case.edu/ech/articles/c/cleveland-freenet
Repeating a bad decision does not make it any wiser.
History will be the judge, and so far it's looking very promising given our progress.
7 replies →
Should've called the new one Freenet 2 or Freenet NT.
Freenet 3.11 for Workgroups
Freenet++