← Back to context

Comment by hackyhacky

1 day ago

> Thanks to capitalism, I don't have to toil in the fields.

No, that's thanks to commerce not to capitalism. Capitalism benefits those those who hold capital, which is not me.

The fact that there are more than enough resources for no one to live in poverty should suggest to you that something is wrong with the distribution system.

"It's true, Mr/Ms Rationalist, that our patented Miracle Medical Snakeoil caused a third of your leg to become necrotic and fall off, but be glad for the two thirds that did not fall off!"

> > Thanks to capitalism, I don't have to toil in the fields.

> No, that's thanks to commerce not to capitalism. Capitalism benefits those those who hold capital, which is not me.

Are you toiling in the fields? It seems to me like your attitude is that "If I can't be rich, then no one should be rich."

> The fact that there are more than enough resources for no one to live in poverty should suggest to you that something is wrong with the distribution system.

So instead of two thirds of the world not living in poverty, everyone should live in poverty equally?

  • > It seems to me like your attitude is that "If I can't be rich, then no one should be rich."

    The problem with capitalism is not that some people get rich and some people don't. The problem is that of an unfair playing field.

    Everyone has a body and a mind, and commerce allows us to rent out those features in exchange for pay. People who are smarter or stronger or work harder or work more will be able to benefit more. That's how I got rich. But there's a limit to how rich I can get, because I have only one body and one mind and there are a finite number of hours in the day.

    The other way to get rich is to own things. If you own a factory or real estate or bonds you get to charge other people and make a profit even though you are expending no effort. And in this case there is no limit on your profit, because you can use your profit to buy more capital and make more profit from that. The result is eventually a winner-take-all economy, where the winners own an increasing amount of society and everyone else pays them to use it. If that sounds familiar, it should, because it's feudelism, and is the eventual end state of capitalism.

    You should really read a bit about the philosophy that you're arguing so vehemently for, apparently without knowing anything about it.

    > So instead of two thirds of the world not living in poverty, everyone should live in poverty equally?

    No, that's ridiculous.

    • It's interesting how when you talk to people who are vocally in favor of capitalism, they always turn out to be in favor of an imaginary version of capitalism where everybody is a small business owner, rather than in favor of how the system works in practice and the outcomes that it necessarily creates.

    • > You should really read a bit about the philosophy that you're arguing so vehemently for, apparently without knowing anything about it.

      You had a good comment until you wrote that. Don't lower your standards with stupid personal attacks.

      > The problem with capitalism is not that some people get rich and some people don't. The problem is that of an unfair playing field.

      I would love for things to be fair, but I grew up in the real world and learned that things weren't fair back when I was a kid in primary school.

      Instead of lamenting about something that I can't control, I decided to focus my efforts on what I can control. Instead of tearing other people down, I built myself up.

      Unless you can change the human characteristic of greed, the world will always be unfair. You can spit into the wind, or you can set a sail.

      4 replies →

    • > The other way to get rich is to own things. If you own a factory or real estate or bonds you get to charge other people and make a profit even though you are expending no effort. And in this case there is no limit on your profit, because you can use your profit to buy more capital and make more profit from that.

      Risk : Reward, that's obvious, isn't it? I have known many relatives who bankrupted themselves trying to "own" stuff. I also know some who succeeded and are rich. Starting a business is very hard, try it.

      1 reply →