← Back to context Comment by 333c 8 hours ago That's a consequence of not being allowed to put yourself in check (by any means). 8 comments 333c Reply anamexis 7 hours ago The only way to put yourself in check is by moving. thejokeisonme 4 hours ago You can put yourself in check by moving the king. That has nothing to do with pinning. Adding a rule for pinning is redundant. yifanl 7 hours ago The only action you can ever take in chess is moving. PowerElectronix 5 hours ago You can resign, too. 333c 7 hours ago Did you mean putting your opponent in check? In chess, you are not allowed to put yourself in check. anamexis 6 hours ago You said “ That's a consequence of not being allowed to put yourself in check (by any means).” My point is that there are no other means. 2 replies →
anamexis 7 hours ago The only way to put yourself in check is by moving. thejokeisonme 4 hours ago You can put yourself in check by moving the king. That has nothing to do with pinning. Adding a rule for pinning is redundant. yifanl 7 hours ago The only action you can ever take in chess is moving. PowerElectronix 5 hours ago You can resign, too. 333c 7 hours ago Did you mean putting your opponent in check? In chess, you are not allowed to put yourself in check. anamexis 6 hours ago You said “ That's a consequence of not being allowed to put yourself in check (by any means).” My point is that there are no other means. 2 replies →
thejokeisonme 4 hours ago You can put yourself in check by moving the king. That has nothing to do with pinning. Adding a rule for pinning is redundant.
yifanl 7 hours ago The only action you can ever take in chess is moving. PowerElectronix 5 hours ago You can resign, too.
333c 7 hours ago Did you mean putting your opponent in check? In chess, you are not allowed to put yourself in check. anamexis 6 hours ago You said “ That's a consequence of not being allowed to put yourself in check (by any means).” My point is that there are no other means. 2 replies →
anamexis 6 hours ago You said “ That's a consequence of not being allowed to put yourself in check (by any means).” My point is that there are no other means. 2 replies →
The only way to put yourself in check is by moving.
You can put yourself in check by moving the king. That has nothing to do with pinning. Adding a rule for pinning is redundant.
The only action you can ever take in chess is moving.
You can resign, too.
Did you mean putting your opponent in check? In chess, you are not allowed to put yourself in check.
You said “ That's a consequence of not being allowed to put yourself in check (by any means).” My point is that there are no other means.
2 replies →