Comment by gpm
2 days ago
I don't see any hypocrisy in the comment you are criticizing. The behavior they are criticizing appears to be vibe coding. How is rejecting something for being vibe coding "exhibiting the behavior" of vibe coding?
2 days ago
I don't see any hypocrisy in the comment you are criticizing. The behavior they are criticizing appears to be vibe coding. How is rejecting something for being vibe coding "exhibiting the behavior" of vibe coding?
You aren't allowed to dismiss vibe coded software based on the slop vibes. It must be well-researched and human reviewed in order to have an opinion.
“Don’t like it – don’t use it, nobody owes you anything”, then the next thread “noooo, why have you stopped using it, you must support my slop”. Absolute cinema.
There’s a big difference between vibe coding and agentic engineering. If you think they are at all the same thing, you need to update your priors
No "engineering" ever stepped foot near that pile of godawful slop.
> pile of godawful slop.
Any software engineer that still rejects the concept of agentic coding is frankly NGMI. If you still see AI this way, you simply never bothered to update your priors, which is just not survivable in this career. I do hope you're already independently wealthy.