Comment by guilhas 2 days ago So a vibed decision to reject vibed code. Minus minus equals plus? 4 comments guilhas Reply burnte 2 days ago I think you should read what the bun devs published about their process. It's not just vibed. guilhas 2 days ago Care to share a link? There are 0 posts on Bun blog, or the GitHub page README announcing/explaining the rational for the rewrite, or project direction burnte 2 days ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073680There's been lots of talk about it here and on his twitter and such. 1 reply →
burnte 2 days ago I think you should read what the bun devs published about their process. It's not just vibed. guilhas 2 days ago Care to share a link? There are 0 posts on Bun blog, or the GitHub page README announcing/explaining the rational for the rewrite, or project direction burnte 2 days ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073680There's been lots of talk about it here and on his twitter and such. 1 reply →
guilhas 2 days ago Care to share a link? There are 0 posts on Bun blog, or the GitHub page README announcing/explaining the rational for the rewrite, or project direction burnte 2 days ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073680There's been lots of talk about it here and on his twitter and such. 1 reply →
burnte 2 days ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073680There's been lots of talk about it here and on his twitter and such. 1 reply →
I think you should read what the bun devs published about their process. It's not just vibed.
Care to share a link? There are 0 posts on Bun blog, or the GitHub page README announcing/explaining the rational for the rewrite, or project direction
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073680
There's been lots of talk about it here and on his twitter and such.
1 reply →