Comment by kelnos
2 days ago
I think it's perfectly rational to take a wait-and-see approach when a dependency has been completely rewritten from scratch.
That would still be rational if it had been rewritten by hand, and not by an LLM.
2 days ago
I think it's perfectly rational to take a wait-and-see approach when a dependency has been completely rewritten from scratch.
That would still be rational if it had been rewritten by hand, and not by an LLM.
This isn't a wait and see approach, this is proactively removing it
It's "we support 4 JS backends, we don't have the capacity to support 5 currently". They're not dropping bun entirely, instead bumping the minimum bun version and not supporting "bunv2" because they don't want to be beta testers.
Has the team announced that they're breaking backwards compatibility, or that testing will be reduced?
8 replies →
Proactively removing work, yes.