Comment by wiseowise
2 days ago
Anyone who isn’t supporting using runtime rewritten by an LLM is obviously “doesn’t get it” and a luddite.
2 days ago
Anyone who isn’t supporting using runtime rewritten by an LLM is obviously “doesn’t get it” and a luddite.
But in this case, the yt-dlp maintainers didn't actually evaluate the rewrite yet, they just declared they wouldn't support it, sight unseen.
Not really an argument on its merits.
OSS is not a testing ground for rewrites made by hyperscalers. Bun is free to fork yt-dlp and prove it is stable enough.
Why is it their job to evaluate a 1m+ line code rewrite?
That’s the fun part no one has evaluated the rewrite yet! Not even the bun team!
Claude says it’s all good though so what could go wrong
[flagged]