← Back to context Comment by j_bum 1 day ago Do you use Claude code on your machine? That seems mostly vibe coded 7 comments j_bum Reply sleples 1 day ago 1. I don't use Claude Code, no.2. It's amazing that a CLI wrapper is as buggy as it is.3. Nevertheless, it's useable, and maybe for a CLI that's enough. I don't want a JS runtime running production to be the same mess. wiseowise 1 day ago Claude Code isn’t a runtime that I use to execute my code with. brabel 1 day ago If you use it to write code for you, then it kind of is, indirectly. dbalatero 1 day ago That is quite the stretch you're making. 1 reply → skeeter2020 1 day ago that seems comparable to taking a dev-time dependency, while bun is a runtime dependency. THey need to be treated very differently. j_bum 1 day ago Fair point, wasn’t considering it from this angle.
sleples 1 day ago 1. I don't use Claude Code, no.2. It's amazing that a CLI wrapper is as buggy as it is.3. Nevertheless, it's useable, and maybe for a CLI that's enough. I don't want a JS runtime running production to be the same mess.
wiseowise 1 day ago Claude Code isn’t a runtime that I use to execute my code with. brabel 1 day ago If you use it to write code for you, then it kind of is, indirectly. dbalatero 1 day ago That is quite the stretch you're making. 1 reply →
brabel 1 day ago If you use it to write code for you, then it kind of is, indirectly. dbalatero 1 day ago That is quite the stretch you're making. 1 reply →
skeeter2020 1 day ago that seems comparable to taking a dev-time dependency, while bun is a runtime dependency. THey need to be treated very differently. j_bum 1 day ago Fair point, wasn’t considering it from this angle.
1. I don't use Claude Code, no.
2. It's amazing that a CLI wrapper is as buggy as it is.
3. Nevertheless, it's useable, and maybe for a CLI that's enough. I don't want a JS runtime running production to be the same mess.
Claude Code isn’t a runtime that I use to execute my code with.
If you use it to write code for you, then it kind of is, indirectly.
That is quite the stretch you're making.
1 reply →
that seems comparable to taking a dev-time dependency, while bun is a runtime dependency. THey need to be treated very differently.
Fair point, wasn’t considering it from this angle.