← Back to context Comment by eurleif 1 day ago Proposal from 2016 (closed): https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/588 1 comment eurleif Reply rezonant 14 hours ago Seems the original ::contents proposal is where it's at now, though there hasn't been action on it for some time. Not sure if they hit a snag or it's just on the back burnerhttps://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2406This proposal has the benefit of not violating the tree structure should multiple :wrap rules apply to overlapping elements.
rezonant 14 hours ago Seems the original ::contents proposal is where it's at now, though there hasn't been action on it for some time. Not sure if they hit a snag or it's just on the back burnerhttps://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2406This proposal has the benefit of not violating the tree structure should multiple :wrap rules apply to overlapping elements.
Seems the original ::contents proposal is where it's at now, though there hasn't been action on it for some time. Not sure if they hit a snag or it's just on the back burner
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2406
This proposal has the benefit of not violating the tree structure should multiple :wrap rules apply to overlapping elements.