Comment by Quarrelsome

21 hours ago

yeah this is the one I've considered as being mildly compelling. But don't we lose the fun of having exception handling as separate to the happy path?

2 comments

Quarrelsome

Reply
exkgkkwksk  15 hours ago

oo and support for exceptions, in particular checked exceptions, was a mistake of the 90s. We know better today, there’s a reason for why modern languages like go/rust/swift don’t use them, and why many use c++ with exceptions disabled.

  • vips7L  2 hours ago

    Checked exceptions are great. There is no difference between them and results/unions except syntax. The below all express the same thing. Swift in fact uses the checked throws syntax.

        Result<T,E> fn()

    T | E fn()

    T fn() throws E

    fn() throws(E) -> T