← Back to context Comment by rembicilious 18 hours ago For me it iſ the old timey eſſ that iſ moſt diſracting. 3 comments rembicilious Reply conorbergin 15 hours ago I'm slightly baffled it existed in the first place, considering they also used the small s, and it looks almost exactly like the f. To be fair, I am equally confused that so many modern typefaces don't distinguish I and l. zombot 14 hours ago I ſuſpect the uſers of ye olde ſ were/are all liſping. dhosek 17 hours ago Yeah, why bother updating the diagrams but then do long s throughout?
conorbergin 15 hours ago I'm slightly baffled it existed in the first place, considering they also used the small s, and it looks almost exactly like the f. To be fair, I am equally confused that so many modern typefaces don't distinguish I and l. zombot 14 hours ago I ſuſpect the uſers of ye olde ſ were/are all liſping.
I'm slightly baffled it existed in the first place, considering they also used the small s, and it looks almost exactly like the f. To be fair, I am equally confused that so many modern typefaces don't distinguish I and l.
I ſuſpect the uſers of ye olde ſ were/are all liſping.
Yeah, why bother updating the diagrams but then do long s throughout?