← Back to context Comment by coliveira 16 hours ago But he didn't, it was given to him by AI. 3 comments coliveira Reply sebastiennight 1 hour ago I'd say many fathers are pretty happy "having kids given to them by a woman" (to use your terminology).It seems you wouldn't give them credit for it, but most of them appear to feel quite a bit of responsibility for bringing those to life. coliveira 11 minutes ago A woman is a human being. An AI is a machine. tasuki 3 hours ago If he was constraining the AI's output, his input was meaningful.Did you ever bring anything to life? Whatever it is, you are also relying on the work others have done before you and standing on the shoulders of giants.
sebastiennight 1 hour ago I'd say many fathers are pretty happy "having kids given to them by a woman" (to use your terminology).It seems you wouldn't give them credit for it, but most of them appear to feel quite a bit of responsibility for bringing those to life. coliveira 11 minutes ago A woman is a human being. An AI is a machine.
tasuki 3 hours ago If he was constraining the AI's output, his input was meaningful.Did you ever bring anything to life? Whatever it is, you are also relying on the work others have done before you and standing on the shoulders of giants.
I'd say many fathers are pretty happy "having kids given to them by a woman" (to use your terminology).
It seems you wouldn't give them credit for it, but most of them appear to feel quite a bit of responsibility for bringing those to life.
A woman is a human being. An AI is a machine.
If he was constraining the AI's output, his input was meaningful.
Did you ever bring anything to life? Whatever it is, you are also relying on the work others have done before you and standing on the shoulders of giants.