← Back to context Comment by CursedSilicon 10 hours ago That sounds like a terrifying legal minefield that they would not want to tread 6 comments CursedSilicon Reply theanonymousone 10 hours ago Is it not safe to assume Window source code is not present in the LLM training data? stavros 10 hours ago No: https://archive.org/download/windows-source-code xandrius 8 hours ago Slap a fair use on it and call it a day. rvnx 5 hours ago > Anthropic offers a formal copyright indemnification policy for its enterprise customers using the Claude API. The policy protects businesses from copyright infringement claims arising from authorized use of Claude or its generated outputsSo just claim it is Claude greenbit 7 hours ago What's that phrase, "derivative work" or something? leni536 9 hours ago But surely anything the LLM outputs is clear of licensing requirements /sOr would Microsoft like to argue otherwise in court?
theanonymousone 10 hours ago Is it not safe to assume Window source code is not present in the LLM training data? stavros 10 hours ago No: https://archive.org/download/windows-source-code
xandrius 8 hours ago Slap a fair use on it and call it a day. rvnx 5 hours ago > Anthropic offers a formal copyright indemnification policy for its enterprise customers using the Claude API. The policy protects businesses from copyright infringement claims arising from authorized use of Claude or its generated outputsSo just claim it is Claude greenbit 7 hours ago What's that phrase, "derivative work" or something?
rvnx 5 hours ago > Anthropic offers a formal copyright indemnification policy for its enterprise customers using the Claude API. The policy protects businesses from copyright infringement claims arising from authorized use of Claude or its generated outputsSo just claim it is Claude
leni536 9 hours ago But surely anything the LLM outputs is clear of licensing requirements /sOr would Microsoft like to argue otherwise in court?
Is it not safe to assume Window source code is not present in the LLM training data?
No: https://archive.org/download/windows-source-code
Slap a fair use on it and call it a day.
> Anthropic offers a formal copyright indemnification policy for its enterprise customers using the Claude API. The policy protects businesses from copyright infringement claims arising from authorized use of Claude or its generated outputs
So just claim it is Claude
What's that phrase, "derivative work" or something?
But surely anything the LLM outputs is clear of licensing requirements /s
Or would Microsoft like to argue otherwise in court?