Comment by einrealist 11 hours ago Maintaining support for Windows is free? 4 comments einrealist Reply rvz 10 hours ago "free" as in what? Time?There is always someone paying. Linux should be no different. fsh 10 hours ago The users are paying plenty of money for AMD FPGAs. mort96 7 hours ago Why should Windows be different? croes 6 hours ago > why I can use BASIC tier for simple, entry-level nodes on Windows, but not on Linux.That’s exactly what people are asking for. Why do Linux users have to pay and Windows users don’t.
rvz 10 hours ago "free" as in what? Time?There is always someone paying. Linux should be no different. fsh 10 hours ago The users are paying plenty of money for AMD FPGAs. mort96 7 hours ago Why should Windows be different? croes 6 hours ago > why I can use BASIC tier for simple, entry-level nodes on Windows, but not on Linux.That’s exactly what people are asking for. Why do Linux users have to pay and Windows users don’t.
croes 6 hours ago > why I can use BASIC tier for simple, entry-level nodes on Windows, but not on Linux.That’s exactly what people are asking for. Why do Linux users have to pay and Windows users don’t.
"free" as in what? Time?
There is always someone paying. Linux should be no different.
The users are paying plenty of money for AMD FPGAs.
Why should Windows be different?
> why I can use BASIC tier for simple, entry-level nodes on Windows, but not on Linux.
That’s exactly what people are asking for. Why do Linux users have to pay and Windows users don’t.