Comment by lazide
15 hours ago
It’s basic self defense. Who runs around the web in 2026 allowing random JS? Might as well be licking seats on the subway.
15 hours ago
It’s basic self defense. Who runs around the web in 2026 allowing random JS? Might as well be licking seats on the subway.
> Who runs around the web in 2026 allowing random JS?
Within a rounding error, 100% of people on the internet.
If you trust your browser it's fine, and if you don't then both CSS and SVG are significantly more risky.
This isn't true at all.
Anything SVG does maliciously, it does by containing JavaScript, so SVG's worst case is a subset of JS's.
Remind me again what the ratio of browser sandbox escapes coupled with full RCE is between JS, CSS, and SVG?
> then both CSS and SVG are significantly more risky.
how???