← Back to context Comment by emilfihlman 9 days ago [flagged] 5 comments emilfihlman Reply farfatched 9 days ago The first draft of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Barrington_Declaration was very biased, but over time it has been neutered.I see this as a win for Wikipedia.Though arguably it being biased during the time of its relevance achieved the goals of the original biased editors. bobanrocky 9 days ago [flagged] oska 9 days ago Gentle suggestion for you to read the guidelines againhttps://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html paulddraper 9 days ago See: Spanish Flu
farfatched 9 days ago The first draft of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Barrington_Declaration was very biased, but over time it has been neutered.I see this as a win for Wikipedia.Though arguably it being biased during the time of its relevance achieved the goals of the original biased editors.
bobanrocky 9 days ago [flagged] oska 9 days ago Gentle suggestion for you to read the guidelines againhttps://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
oska 9 days ago Gentle suggestion for you to read the guidelines againhttps://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
The first draft of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Barrington_Declaration was very biased, but over time it has been neutered.
I see this as a win for Wikipedia.
Though arguably it being biased during the time of its relevance achieved the goals of the original biased editors.
[flagged]
Gentle suggestion for you to read the guidelines again
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
See: Spanish Flu