Comment by duped
1 day ago
AI companies/users are filled with liars and grifters, so any numbers/outlook they report should be highly suspect.
1 day ago
AI companies/users are filled with liars and grifters, so any numbers/outlook they report should be highly suspect.
I must admit that I am going to find it fascinating when we hit the point where it becomes nearly impossible to deny the efficacy of these tools. I have straight up had people, even in real life, suggest that I'm lying about my productivity gains or what I'm able to accomplish with them.
Like, I understand the reasonable arguments against (I even agree with a few), but it's clear that some people have fully inserted their head into the sand and just don't want to believe any of this could be true. Which will be harsh, since I think getting hit with this train all at once in the future is going to be a rougher ride than a slower coming-to-terms-with, even if the result is one we're unhappy with.
I don't deny their efficacy, I'm saying that there's a massive crop of grifters and liars building them and using them.
What is the motivation for us users to lie about our experiences? It's to the degree now that people simply refuse to believe that I'm honestly describing my experiences with these tools?
I understand the motivations for the labs to lie, but what do you think mine is?
In the meanwhile, Google AI search still says the next year after 2026 will be 2028.
Ok? Then don't use AI to do arithmetic. It's not their strong suit.
3 replies →
There's a saying "the fish stinks from the head".