← Back to context Comment by robinhouston 3 hours ago The edit history of the “nonsense sequence” makes for painful reading.https://oeis.org/history?seq=A133451&start=0&n=30 2 comments robinhouston Reply dooglius 3 hours ago I am missing some context here what was wrong with the original description? robinhouston 1 hour ago The original title was this:> Graph substitution of two octahedra inside an icosahedron connected at p=1: disconnected at p=0 ( concept similar to two tetrahedra inside a cube).Can you explain what that means, and how it leads to a sequence of integers? I think it is nonsense.
dooglius 3 hours ago I am missing some context here what was wrong with the original description? robinhouston 1 hour ago The original title was this:> Graph substitution of two octahedra inside an icosahedron connected at p=1: disconnected at p=0 ( concept similar to two tetrahedra inside a cube).Can you explain what that means, and how it leads to a sequence of integers? I think it is nonsense.
robinhouston 1 hour ago The original title was this:> Graph substitution of two octahedra inside an icosahedron connected at p=1: disconnected at p=0 ( concept similar to two tetrahedra inside a cube).Can you explain what that means, and how it leads to a sequence of integers? I think it is nonsense.
I am missing some context here what was wrong with the original description?
The original title was this:
> Graph substitution of two octahedra inside an icosahedron connected at p=1: disconnected at p=0 ( concept similar to two tetrahedra inside a cube).
Can you explain what that means, and how it leads to a sequence of integers? I think it is nonsense.