← Back to context

Comment by 999900000999

2 hours ago

>Those schools would also not be paid unless the students do well in the next phase of their education

The teachers would just fill in the tests for the students.

This has already happened in some places.

The bigger macro economic issues would probably be the collapse of the middle class, rampant housing and food insecurity.

Hirerarcy of needs and all that.

Anyway with The Republicans going out of their way to restrict student visas it's unclear where our next generation of high achivers is going to come from.

We sure aren't raising them here.

> The teachers would just fill in the tests for the students.

Fraud is illegal. If the law isn't going to be enforced, then trying to fix the law is useless.

I agree about food insecurity. Nationally, it's worse now than it was during COVID. California actually made some good progress on that a few years ago:

https://www.cafoodbanks.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/SB138...

I haven't checked food insecurity rates since then, but you may have noticed that food collection barrels have become rare around the holidays. At least for a few years, the food banks in Silicon Valley were truck-constrained, not food-constrained, so those barrels weren't worth the effort.

  • You’re putting a lot of otherwise good people, teachers of low income students, into a very bad situation.

    Many would just quit, and among those who stayed what are the options ?

    Get fired when the school is shutdown for under performing.

    Fill in tests for students.

    If we use programming as an example, the best tech manager on earth can’t get a bunch of random people to write production ready code in a month ( maybe JS, but not Rust).

    Public schools can’t pick and choose students. Charters sorta can.

    If I ran the school system I’d set up *paid* apprenticeship to job programs in high schools. Actually get these kids real careers. You SHOULD be able to afford an apartment with a high school degree.