← Back to context

Comment by tracker1

3 hours ago

Do you want to get rid of "advanced" course options and push every student into the same bucket?

I'd be fine with that. It would provide an incentive to care about the bottom 75th percentile along with the spoiled rich kids

  • Just FYI I was dirt poor and from a crap neighborhood and qualified for and benefited from these AP classes. Not all kids who succeed only succeed because of their background.

    • I am from the same situation. I speak from experience: social mobility in public school is the exception. I would have done just fine without AP classes at all, as I am sure you would have. It's the kids who need help that benefit from school.

      AP classes exist to pad the resumes of rich kids and justify their being propelled into academic situations that should rightfully belong to others. Prove me wrong

      1 reply →

  • The bottom 75th percentile don't advance humanity to nearly the same level. Do you think you'd have the internet or iPads if everyone was capped to the 75th percentile? No.

    Beyond this, the entire point of higher education is to push those who are able to higher levels, not to drag the 75% along for the ride.

    • > The bottom 75th percentile don't advance humanity to nearly the same level.

      Who do you think produces all the value in the world? It's not the people organizing the labor, it's the goddamn laborers.

      > Do you think you'd have the internet or iPads if everyone was capped to the 75th percentile? No.

      What do you think we would be eating if we left the world up to the rich nerds? We would have starved many millennia ago.

      4 replies →

  • That's horrible. Smarter kids could get a better education, but they can't, because the teachers have to deal with illiterate kids that don't want to learn in the first place.