← Back to context Comment by halestock 1 day ago I can't predict the outcome of an RNG but that doesn't mean it grows the numbers. 5 comments halestock Reply Philpax 1 day ago Okay, but that's not relevant to AI training? halestock 1 day ago I was being very roundabout, but my point is that AIs are still built, not grown. dwaltrip 21 hours ago “Grown” is a highly apt metaphor, IMO. It quite succinctly captures some of the most fundamental differences between building Claude and building an Ikea desk, for example. Smaug123 1 day ago ("If grown, then unpredictable" is unrelated to your apparent attempted refutation "But X is unpredictable and not grown; checkmate".) umanwizard 1 day ago "X implies Y" doesn't imply "Y implies X".
Philpax 1 day ago Okay, but that's not relevant to AI training? halestock 1 day ago I was being very roundabout, but my point is that AIs are still built, not grown. dwaltrip 21 hours ago “Grown” is a highly apt metaphor, IMO. It quite succinctly captures some of the most fundamental differences between building Claude and building an Ikea desk, for example.
halestock 1 day ago I was being very roundabout, but my point is that AIs are still built, not grown. dwaltrip 21 hours ago “Grown” is a highly apt metaphor, IMO. It quite succinctly captures some of the most fundamental differences between building Claude and building an Ikea desk, for example.
dwaltrip 21 hours ago “Grown” is a highly apt metaphor, IMO. It quite succinctly captures some of the most fundamental differences between building Claude and building an Ikea desk, for example.
Smaug123 1 day ago ("If grown, then unpredictable" is unrelated to your apparent attempted refutation "But X is unpredictable and not grown; checkmate".)
Okay, but that's not relevant to AI training?
I was being very roundabout, but my point is that AIs are still built, not grown.
“Grown” is a highly apt metaphor, IMO. It quite succinctly captures some of the most fundamental differences between building Claude and building an Ikea desk, for example.
("If grown, then unpredictable" is unrelated to your apparent attempted refutation "But X is unpredictable and not grown; checkmate".)
"X implies Y" doesn't imply "Y implies X".