← Back to context Comment by eddythompson80 1 month ago ahh, the false analogy comment. 5 comments eddythompson80 Reply _karie_ 1 month ago “False analogy” isn’t a counterpoint, it's a deflection. What part of the mapping breaks for you? eddythompson80 1 month ago False analogy isn’t a deflection, it’s a logical fallacy. _karie_ 1 month ago Because you don't agree doesn't make the legitimate callout (i.e., victim-blaming “what were you wearing” vs. calling someone “unhinged” after they've endured repeated abuse/stress) a logical fallacy. Rather it positions you in opposition.Everything you disagree with isn't incorrect. 2 replies →
_karie_ 1 month ago “False analogy” isn’t a counterpoint, it's a deflection. What part of the mapping breaks for you? eddythompson80 1 month ago False analogy isn’t a deflection, it’s a logical fallacy. _karie_ 1 month ago Because you don't agree doesn't make the legitimate callout (i.e., victim-blaming “what were you wearing” vs. calling someone “unhinged” after they've endured repeated abuse/stress) a logical fallacy. Rather it positions you in opposition.Everything you disagree with isn't incorrect. 2 replies →
eddythompson80 1 month ago False analogy isn’t a deflection, it’s a logical fallacy. _karie_ 1 month ago Because you don't agree doesn't make the legitimate callout (i.e., victim-blaming “what were you wearing” vs. calling someone “unhinged” after they've endured repeated abuse/stress) a logical fallacy. Rather it positions you in opposition.Everything you disagree with isn't incorrect. 2 replies →
_karie_ 1 month ago Because you don't agree doesn't make the legitimate callout (i.e., victim-blaming “what were you wearing” vs. calling someone “unhinged” after they've endured repeated abuse/stress) a logical fallacy. Rather it positions you in opposition.Everything you disagree with isn't incorrect. 2 replies →
“False analogy” isn’t a counterpoint, it's a deflection. What part of the mapping breaks for you?
False analogy isn’t a deflection, it’s a logical fallacy.
Because you don't agree doesn't make the legitimate callout (i.e., victim-blaming “what were you wearing” vs. calling someone “unhinged” after they've endured repeated abuse/stress) a logical fallacy. Rather it positions you in opposition.
Everything you disagree with isn't incorrect.
2 replies →