Comment by selcuka
2 days ago
That's an interesting take. You didn't want to bother with running a local Temporal, but you are happy to engineer it yourself in Postgres?
2 days ago
That's an interesting take. You didn't want to bother with running a local Temporal, but you are happy to engineer it yourself in Postgres?
We already have a Postgres instance running (as I'm sure most stacks have), so it's just another database table rather than a whole new piece of infrastructure that needs to be maintained, with its associated cost, attack surface, risk of Temporal going under or dropping support for OSS, authentication, and other unknowns.