← Back to context Comment by gregorygoc 1 day ago No 4 comments gregorygoc Reply fragmede 1 day ago Yes they have. They cost more. Why keep the senior curmudgeon employee around when the Jr who costs half as much is deemed sufficiently competent? And the Jr isn't going to quit in solidarity either, they're just happy to have not gotten cut. gregorygoc 1 day ago Junior employees are not sufficiently competent. chadgpt3 17 hours ago Competency isn't the layoff criterion, cost is fzeroracer 21 hours ago Competency doesn't matter for corporations.
fragmede 1 day ago Yes they have. They cost more. Why keep the senior curmudgeon employee around when the Jr who costs half as much is deemed sufficiently competent? And the Jr isn't going to quit in solidarity either, they're just happy to have not gotten cut. gregorygoc 1 day ago Junior employees are not sufficiently competent. chadgpt3 17 hours ago Competency isn't the layoff criterion, cost is fzeroracer 21 hours ago Competency doesn't matter for corporations.
gregorygoc 1 day ago Junior employees are not sufficiently competent. chadgpt3 17 hours ago Competency isn't the layoff criterion, cost is fzeroracer 21 hours ago Competency doesn't matter for corporations.
Yes they have. They cost more. Why keep the senior curmudgeon employee around when the Jr who costs half as much is deemed sufficiently competent? And the Jr isn't going to quit in solidarity either, they're just happy to have not gotten cut.
Junior employees are not sufficiently competent.
Competency isn't the layoff criterion, cost is
Competency doesn't matter for corporations.