← Back to context

Comment by BeetleB

1 day ago

I hate Musk, and I'm not going to justify Tesla's crazy stock valuation, but consider the following:

Outside of China, Tesla's probably the only company that can compete on battery prices. I don't know how accurate it was, but a news report was comparing the cost the manufacturer's pay to build the battery. Chinese companies were around $6000. Tesla was at $7000. Everyone else was around $12-15K. This is why a number of companies have exited the EV market - they just can't compete. This is why Ford lost money on every EV, despite the high MSRP. This is why the Ford CEO says "We're f####d" when he saw Chinese cars.

The only hope regular Japanese/American/European auto manufacturers have is if EVs do not gain substantial market share.

If the future is EVs, Tesla is the only non-Chinese company that has a chance.

It's depressing.

This assumes it is literally impossible for anyone else to reduce their battery costs to a level which makes them competitive with Tesla in an environment when battery prices are falling rapidly and the tech continues to evolve (and Tesla's EVs are not even unusually cheap or experimental in their battery supply chains)

That sounds less likely than the bull case Tesla is trying to make on "we're a robotics company now" or "one day all cars will be autonomous taxis controlled by us".

  • Exactly. Looking at competition from China, but also the West, I don't see Tesla having a moat in EVs, in robots, or even in batteries in the medium term (compare e.g. [1]).

    How can they produce the extraordinary growth and excess profits that would justify their valuation?

    Fundamentals will reassert themselves sooner or later, but as we see it can take a long time.

    [1] https://electrek.co/2026/05/07/tesla-4680-battery-cell-perfo...

  • Tesla has vertical integration with their batteries, which is why they can make them cheaply.

    > This assumes it is literally impossible for anyone else to reduce their battery costs to a level which makes them competitive with Tesla in an environment when battery prices are falling rapidly and the tech continues to evolve

    No - it just means they can't do it as fast as the Chinese. The Chinese have been investing in battery technology for 10-15 years longer than most auto manufacturers. (And their labor is cheaper).

It's not depressing because it's not true. Tesla isn't investing in battery technology. Tesla also isn't developing new models at the same rate as VW, BMW, Mercedes, Hyundai Kia, etc.

  • > Tesla also isn't developing new models at the same rate as VW, BMW, Mercedes, Hyundai Kia, etc.

    BMW and Mercedes are not in the same class. They can afford to get away by charging a premium.

    VW: I'd love to know how much it costs them to make/buy a battery, and their profit margins on EVs. Ditto Hyundai and Kia.

    (Edit: See https://carbuzz.com/ev-profit-margins/ for VW).

    Look at all the companies scaling back on EVs or exiting them altogether (e.g. Honda). It's not that Honda can't make EVs. It's that they can't compete on profit with Tesla + Chinese EVs. It's likely why Hyundai is dropping the Kona and the Ioniq 6.

    Nissan dropped the Ariya, I believe. The Bolt is also out. The general shift is for more luxury EVs (BMW/Mercedes), and not EVs for the average Joe.

    See also https://www.bain.com/insights/electric-vehicles-profit-puzzl...

    • Giving up on EVs is crazy though, it seals their fate and guarantees the death of the company in exchange for a few more years of profit. The EV takeover will not stop, as of roughly this year they’re going to be cheaper than equivalent ice cars, it’s going to accelerate quickly. It’s suicide in slow motion

  • This. It doesn't really look like Tesla is doing anything rn but selling old cars. They don't appear to be the future any more.

    • It doesn't look like they are developing self-driving?

      What other company is developing self-driving at a level of sophistication as Tesla that you can actually buy in a consumer vehicle?

      5 replies →