← Back to context Comment by dominotw 21 hours ago doesnt seem unreasonable. 6 comments dominotw Reply halJordan 21 hours ago These faux questions always have a valid interpretation that the asker doesn't admit (for some reason). The model is then castigated for not making an opinionated choice kennywinker 20 hours ago That’s not what’s happening.The question is revealing that the model has a model of language but not of reality. It knows what words go together, but not real-world concepts. ahoka 8 hours ago This. LLMs are marketed on the false premise of all knowledge, intelligence and wisdom being possible to be encoded in language only. dd8601fn 14 hours ago As a test, explaining away peculiar answers by imagining unlikely outlier scenarios is not the counter you seem to think it is.For most of them, we’d worry that a human answerer using maximum effort to produce the same outcome was having a stroke. otabdeveloper4 20 hours ago [dead] m463 14 hours ago maybe unreasoning.also, naysayers apparently DO have a compelling reason.
halJordan 21 hours ago These faux questions always have a valid interpretation that the asker doesn't admit (for some reason). The model is then castigated for not making an opinionated choice kennywinker 20 hours ago That’s not what’s happening.The question is revealing that the model has a model of language but not of reality. It knows what words go together, but not real-world concepts. ahoka 8 hours ago This. LLMs are marketed on the false premise of all knowledge, intelligence and wisdom being possible to be encoded in language only. dd8601fn 14 hours ago As a test, explaining away peculiar answers by imagining unlikely outlier scenarios is not the counter you seem to think it is.For most of them, we’d worry that a human answerer using maximum effort to produce the same outcome was having a stroke. otabdeveloper4 20 hours ago [dead]
kennywinker 20 hours ago That’s not what’s happening.The question is revealing that the model has a model of language but not of reality. It knows what words go together, but not real-world concepts. ahoka 8 hours ago This. LLMs are marketed on the false premise of all knowledge, intelligence and wisdom being possible to be encoded in language only.
ahoka 8 hours ago This. LLMs are marketed on the false premise of all knowledge, intelligence and wisdom being possible to be encoded in language only.
dd8601fn 14 hours ago As a test, explaining away peculiar answers by imagining unlikely outlier scenarios is not the counter you seem to think it is.For most of them, we’d worry that a human answerer using maximum effort to produce the same outcome was having a stroke.
These faux questions always have a valid interpretation that the asker doesn't admit (for some reason). The model is then castigated for not making an opinionated choice
That’s not what’s happening.
The question is revealing that the model has a model of language but not of reality. It knows what words go together, but not real-world concepts.
This. LLMs are marketed on the false premise of all knowledge, intelligence and wisdom being possible to be encoded in language only.
As a test, explaining away peculiar answers by imagining unlikely outlier scenarios is not the counter you seem to think it is.
For most of them, we’d worry that a human answerer using maximum effort to produce the same outcome was having a stroke.
[dead]
maybe unreasoning.
also, naysayers apparently DO have a compelling reason.