← Back to context

Comment by Aurornis

15 hours ago

> What’s wrong with not using the community model for their internal tests? I’m sure they have a good reason. It can’t possibly be just NIH

The problem with their models is that it's a cone shape. The angle is fixed.

The community models are domed so you can see the effect at different angles.

> Plus they’re working with the open filament database that as established to go with the open source NFC tags they cooperated with other companies on.

Right, but they're steering people back their sources when the community sites have more user-submitted coverage and it's what we've all been using successfully already.

I probably shouldn't have said anything given the topic and the audience. I know they gave some credit, but there's a long history in the 3D printing world of this stuff happening.

Yeah the dome gives you more angles. That may be the problem. If you’re testing a color mixing algorithm and measuring the output a larger surface at a single angle is probably much easier to measure constantly with colorimeters. If you can’t predict one angle accurately how will you predict others?

That’s just a guess. I’m sure there’s a reason.