← Back to context Comment by justinlivi 38 minutes ago Any supposed "AI BDFL" will be controlled by a human. The base concept is inherently flawed. 2 comments justinlivi Reply theptip 24 minutes ago No.. that’s not what AI succession means. This all supposes a powerful and capable enough AI entity that there is no human in control.Rather than simply asserting that your interlocutors are wrong, you are welcome to advance an argument for why you think this is the case. satisfice 16 minutes ago The burden of proof is not on us to show why wishful, magical thinking is wrong.People who claim that AI will take over can’t point to any evidence. All they have is speculation.
theptip 24 minutes ago No.. that’s not what AI succession means. This all supposes a powerful and capable enough AI entity that there is no human in control.Rather than simply asserting that your interlocutors are wrong, you are welcome to advance an argument for why you think this is the case. satisfice 16 minutes ago The burden of proof is not on us to show why wishful, magical thinking is wrong.People who claim that AI will take over can’t point to any evidence. All they have is speculation.
satisfice 16 minutes ago The burden of proof is not on us to show why wishful, magical thinking is wrong.People who claim that AI will take over can’t point to any evidence. All they have is speculation.
No.. that’s not what AI succession means. This all supposes a powerful and capable enough AI entity that there is no human in control.
Rather than simply asserting that your interlocutors are wrong, you are welcome to advance an argument for why you think this is the case.
The burden of proof is not on us to show why wishful, magical thinking is wrong.
People who claim that AI will take over can’t point to any evidence. All they have is speculation.