← Back to context Comment by llimllib 3 hours ago the surreal docs should not say "surreal is open source", it's source-available under the BSL 4 comments llimllib Reply redwood 3 hours ago I'd love to see the OSI mature it's license taxonomy for 2026 limagnolia 1 hour ago The OSI definition is just fine for software licenses. It doesn't need to "mature". The BSL is not compatible with the principles and concept of open source software. redwood 1 hour ago I disagree. Current posture makes it nearly impossible for European companies to build software centric open source businesses. 1 reply →
redwood 3 hours ago I'd love to see the OSI mature it's license taxonomy for 2026 limagnolia 1 hour ago The OSI definition is just fine for software licenses. It doesn't need to "mature". The BSL is not compatible with the principles and concept of open source software. redwood 1 hour ago I disagree. Current posture makes it nearly impossible for European companies to build software centric open source businesses. 1 reply →
limagnolia 1 hour ago The OSI definition is just fine for software licenses. It doesn't need to "mature". The BSL is not compatible with the principles and concept of open source software. redwood 1 hour ago I disagree. Current posture makes it nearly impossible for European companies to build software centric open source businesses. 1 reply →
redwood 1 hour ago I disagree. Current posture makes it nearly impossible for European companies to build software centric open source businesses. 1 reply →
I'd love to see the OSI mature it's license taxonomy for 2026
The OSI definition is just fine for software licenses. It doesn't need to "mature". The BSL is not compatible with the principles and concept of open source software.
I disagree. Current posture makes it nearly impossible for European companies to build software centric open source businesses.
1 reply →