← Back to context

Comment by locknitpicker

12 hours ago

> You're claiming without evidence that the bureaucracy and regulators are corrupt to the core?

The "bureaucracy and regulators" are at most engaged in passive corruption.

For passive corruption to exist, you need massive active corruption effort.

Why is everyone focusing on vilifying passive corruption while completely ignoring active corruption? I mean, I'm hearing lots of conspiratorial remarks directed at regulators but... Who stood to benefit? Aren't those responsible?

I mean, why was regulation required to begin with?