← Back to context Comment by LtWorf 3 hours ago Half the posts here are AI grifting. 4 comments LtWorf Reply whyenot 3 hours ago That’s a pretty extraordinary claim. Do you have anything quantitative to back it up? HN has bots, I think that is a fair assumption, but half? How do you know that for sure? GroksBarnacles 2 hours ago [flagged] dcuthbertson 2 hours ago TIL that statements of obvious exaggeration are called causal, hyperbolic statements. Who knew?All kidding aside, I've never heard them called causal hyperbolic before. It's a good term.
whyenot 3 hours ago That’s a pretty extraordinary claim. Do you have anything quantitative to back it up? HN has bots, I think that is a fair assumption, but half? How do you know that for sure? GroksBarnacles 2 hours ago [flagged] dcuthbertson 2 hours ago TIL that statements of obvious exaggeration are called causal, hyperbolic statements. Who knew?All kidding aside, I've never heard them called causal hyperbolic before. It's a good term.
GroksBarnacles 2 hours ago [flagged] dcuthbertson 2 hours ago TIL that statements of obvious exaggeration are called causal, hyperbolic statements. Who knew?All kidding aside, I've never heard them called causal hyperbolic before. It's a good term.
dcuthbertson 2 hours ago TIL that statements of obvious exaggeration are called causal, hyperbolic statements. Who knew?All kidding aside, I've never heard them called causal hyperbolic before. It's a good term.
That’s a pretty extraordinary claim. Do you have anything quantitative to back it up? HN has bots, I think that is a fair assumption, but half? How do you know that for sure?
[flagged]
TIL that statements of obvious exaggeration are called causal, hyperbolic statements. Who knew?
All kidding aside, I've never heard them called causal hyperbolic before. It's a good term.