Comment by some_furry
1 day ago
https://soatok.blog/2026/04/13/hybrid-constructions-the-post...
I wrote this in April. Many folks' misconceptions about post-quantum cryptography and "hybrid" constructions are answerable with this blog post.
1 day ago
https://soatok.blog/2026/04/13/hybrid-constructions-the-post...
I wrote this in April. Many folks' misconceptions about post-quantum cryptography and "hybrid" constructions are answerable with this blog post.
There is nothing answered in there. Just "It'll be fine" and vague pointing at unrelated ecc vulnerabilities in some libs. It totally lacks any rational arguments.
the rational argument is that this time is not particularly worse than prior transitions, and arguably is one we are doing much more clear-eyed (think about all the ECC vulnerabilities during their first few years of deployment due to not knowing how to "pick safe curves". The analogous issue for standardized NIST PQ schemes is understood very well). So the hysteria around the transition, from an expert's perspective, is misplaced.
This doesn't guarantee things will work. In cryptography there are no guarantees. In particular, failing to transition fast enough can also lead to vulnerabilities (by this I mean quantum attacks. Cryptographers are increasingly worried this may happen very soon. I've seen some estimate as soon as 2030). So there is an underlying tension in changing, and also a clear worry about not changing.
No shit. It is a blog post, not an academic paper or Lean proof.
My blog posts are supposed to be informal and conversational, not pure logic. If you want "ratioanl arguments", look elsewhere than personal blogs.