A discovery about GCC's unidirectional rotation algorithm 4 days ago (devblogs.microsoft.com) 10 comments soheilpro Reply Add to library jdw64 2 hours ago Looking at this, I feel that while there seem to be many different actual implementations, they really boil down to just a few similar core principles srean 6 hours ago 'Shocking', 'striking', 'disappointing', 'will shock you' -- the article is padded with hyperbole. jraph 3 hours ago This is obviously humor.You stopped at the lexicon, check how it's used more thoroughly! srean 3 hours ago Struck by (his) Poes I suppose. 1 reply → saagarjha 6 hours ago Gee I wonder why Raymond would do that srean 4 hours ago I have no context. Was that sarcasm ? I have no idea if this is expected or unexpected of Raymond. 2 replies → DonHopkins 5 hours ago He found that gambling was going on in here!
jdw64 2 hours ago Looking at this, I feel that while there seem to be many different actual implementations, they really boil down to just a few similar core principles
srean 6 hours ago 'Shocking', 'striking', 'disappointing', 'will shock you' -- the article is padded with hyperbole. jraph 3 hours ago This is obviously humor.You stopped at the lexicon, check how it's used more thoroughly! srean 3 hours ago Struck by (his) Poes I suppose. 1 reply → saagarjha 6 hours ago Gee I wonder why Raymond would do that srean 4 hours ago I have no context. Was that sarcasm ? I have no idea if this is expected or unexpected of Raymond. 2 replies → DonHopkins 5 hours ago He found that gambling was going on in here!
jraph 3 hours ago This is obviously humor.You stopped at the lexicon, check how it's used more thoroughly! srean 3 hours ago Struck by (his) Poes I suppose. 1 reply →
saagarjha 6 hours ago Gee I wonder why Raymond would do that srean 4 hours ago I have no context. Was that sarcasm ? I have no idea if this is expected or unexpected of Raymond. 2 replies →
srean 4 hours ago I have no context. Was that sarcasm ? I have no idea if this is expected or unexpected of Raymond. 2 replies →
Looking at this, I feel that while there seem to be many different actual implementations, they really boil down to just a few similar core principles
'Shocking', 'striking', 'disappointing', 'will shock you' -- the article is padded with hyperbole.
This is obviously humor.
You stopped at the lexicon, check how it's used more thoroughly!
Struck by (his) Poes I suppose.
1 reply →
Gee I wonder why Raymond would do that
I have no context. Was that sarcasm ? I have no idea if this is expected or unexpected of Raymond.
2 replies →
He found that gambling was going on in here!