← Back to context Comment by trick-or-treat 1 day ago That's because Panpsychism is silly. 4 comments trick-or-treat Reply IsTom 21 hours ago I don't think it's any more silly than the alternatives. trick-or-treat 21 hours ago You don't think it's sillier than "rocks don't have consciousness"? IsTom 21 hours ago Potential for consciousness. To have a working mind you need to have a way to gather, process and store information. In case of rocks it would be very empty, static, timeless experience. 1 reply →
IsTom 21 hours ago I don't think it's any more silly than the alternatives. trick-or-treat 21 hours ago You don't think it's sillier than "rocks don't have consciousness"? IsTom 21 hours ago Potential for consciousness. To have a working mind you need to have a way to gather, process and store information. In case of rocks it would be very empty, static, timeless experience. 1 reply →
trick-or-treat 21 hours ago You don't think it's sillier than "rocks don't have consciousness"? IsTom 21 hours ago Potential for consciousness. To have a working mind you need to have a way to gather, process and store information. In case of rocks it would be very empty, static, timeless experience. 1 reply →
IsTom 21 hours ago Potential for consciousness. To have a working mind you need to have a way to gather, process and store information. In case of rocks it would be very empty, static, timeless experience. 1 reply →
I don't think it's any more silly than the alternatives.
You don't think it's sillier than "rocks don't have consciousness"?
Potential for consciousness. To have a working mind you need to have a way to gather, process and store information. In case of rocks it would be very empty, static, timeless experience.
1 reply →