← Back to context Comment by bandrami 16 hours ago The other part of that is that while price per token may be going down, tokens per task is going up 2 comments bandrami Reply no-name-here 16 hours ago For ~equivalent tasks/results, or because we’re expecting more or better from tasks?The real measure should be cost per ~equivalent task result, not cost per token nor tokens per task. bandrami 15 hours ago For better performance of ~equivalent tasks. That's what all the harness tooling people are using does: (often) increasing output quality by significantly increasing token counts.
no-name-here 16 hours ago For ~equivalent tasks/results, or because we’re expecting more or better from tasks?The real measure should be cost per ~equivalent task result, not cost per token nor tokens per task. bandrami 15 hours ago For better performance of ~equivalent tasks. That's what all the harness tooling people are using does: (often) increasing output quality by significantly increasing token counts.
bandrami 15 hours ago For better performance of ~equivalent tasks. That's what all the harness tooling people are using does: (often) increasing output quality by significantly increasing token counts.
For ~equivalent tasks/results, or because we’re expecting more or better from tasks?
The real measure should be cost per ~equivalent task result, not cost per token nor tokens per task.
For better performance of ~equivalent tasks. That's what all the harness tooling people are using does: (often) increasing output quality by significantly increasing token counts.