← Back to context Comment by brainwad 10 hours ago This is clearly fair use parody. 3 comments brainwad Reply namuol 10 hours ago I never said it wasn’t fair use, I just think it’s kind of disrespectful of the author’s wishes. Being legal doesn’t make it moral or admirable. brainwad 10 hours ago I generally give short shrift to the idea of author's moral rights , _especially_ when they try to use those rights to stop derivative works. OP credited Bisson, that's enough in my books. namuol 9 hours ago I find it in poor taste, but maybe that’s the point.
namuol 10 hours ago I never said it wasn’t fair use, I just think it’s kind of disrespectful of the author’s wishes. Being legal doesn’t make it moral or admirable. brainwad 10 hours ago I generally give short shrift to the idea of author's moral rights , _especially_ when they try to use those rights to stop derivative works. OP credited Bisson, that's enough in my books. namuol 9 hours ago I find it in poor taste, but maybe that’s the point.
brainwad 10 hours ago I generally give short shrift to the idea of author's moral rights , _especially_ when they try to use those rights to stop derivative works. OP credited Bisson, that's enough in my books. namuol 9 hours ago I find it in poor taste, but maybe that’s the point.
I never said it wasn’t fair use, I just think it’s kind of disrespectful of the author’s wishes. Being legal doesn’t make it moral or admirable.
I generally give short shrift to the idea of author's moral rights , _especially_ when they try to use those rights to stop derivative works. OP credited Bisson, that's enough in my books.
I find it in poor taste, but maybe that’s the point.