← Back to context Comment by Art9681 19 hours ago I would suggest that you reverse those roles. gpt-5.5 as the implementer and Opus as the reviewer. 2 comments Art9681 Reply hombre_fatal 18 hours ago They find different things, and there's no reason to use one model for review. You want to review it until there's nothing left to be unearth.And if you put the review effort into polishing an impl plan, then it doesn't matter which model implements it either. pluralmonad 18 hours ago How come? I find Opus to have better taste and GPT to have more rigor.
hombre_fatal 18 hours ago They find different things, and there's no reason to use one model for review. You want to review it until there's nothing left to be unearth.And if you put the review effort into polishing an impl plan, then it doesn't matter which model implements it either.
They find different things, and there's no reason to use one model for review. You want to review it until there's nothing left to be unearth.
And if you put the review effort into polishing an impl plan, then it doesn't matter which model implements it either.
How come? I find Opus to have better taste and GPT to have more rigor.