← Back to context Comment by Levitz 4 hours ago [flagged] 1 comment Levitz Reply tcp_handshaker 3 hours ago I see...So the argument is not wrong because you refuted it... instead because you promoted yourself to the position of deciding which claims are allowed to be subjected to scrutiny and evidence. :-))"What we know about the plan to give Americans an equity stake in AI" - https://www.ft.com/content/8559a3f9-86de-4a1c-8a75-6623e83e6..."OpenAI discussed government loan guarantees for chip plants, not data centers, Altman says" - https://www.reuters.com/business/openai-does-not-want-govern...
tcp_handshaker 3 hours ago I see...So the argument is not wrong because you refuted it... instead because you promoted yourself to the position of deciding which claims are allowed to be subjected to scrutiny and evidence. :-))"What we know about the plan to give Americans an equity stake in AI" - https://www.ft.com/content/8559a3f9-86de-4a1c-8a75-6623e83e6..."OpenAI discussed government loan guarantees for chip plants, not data centers, Altman says" - https://www.reuters.com/business/openai-does-not-want-govern...
I see...So the argument is not wrong because you refuted it... instead because you promoted yourself to the position of deciding which claims are allowed to be subjected to scrutiny and evidence. :-))
"What we know about the plan to give Americans an equity stake in AI" - https://www.ft.com/content/8559a3f9-86de-4a1c-8a75-6623e83e6...
"OpenAI discussed government loan guarantees for chip plants, not data centers, Altman says" - https://www.reuters.com/business/openai-does-not-want-govern...