Comment by Luc
2 hours ago
The rigging on the surrounding ships is nonsensical. AI generated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Admiralty_floating_doc...
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6f/HMS_Psyc...
2 hours ago
The rigging on the surrounding ships is nonsensical. AI generated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Admiralty_floating_doc...
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6f/HMS_Psyc...
There was a time in the early steamship days where they carried both engines and sails. If that's what you object to it's very easy to verify this with historical records.
If something else, sure maybe.
It looks like a (modern or old) version of this print: "The Bermuda Floating Dock, In Tow of H.M.Ss Warrior and Black Prince and Terrible astern Leaving Porto Santo for their Voyage across the Atlantic, July 4th 1869"
https://www.rmg.co.uk/stories/maritime-history/library-archi...
I don’t get it. It sounds like you are claiming the article image is not AI slop, but rather an old print. But then you link to something that isn’t even remotely like the article image.
It was common for paintings/etchings to be made based on existing paintings in the 19th century - I'm guessing the painting link I gave was probably close to an original or source.
There's lots of similar images on the internet, this image on Alamy claims to scanned from a Victorian mechanical‑engineering book of the 1880s
https://www.alamy.com/an-old-engraving-showing-the-british-f...
It looks like AI generated based on https://nmb.bm/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/IMG_011054-1536x10... for what it’s worth. Would have preferred to see the original though.
/e: this is likely not the illustration you were referring to I realize now.
Not to mention the presence of two small boats which are not the type you'd want to cross an ocean in.
[dead]