← Back to context Comment by USTECH_WORKER 2 days ago Can you expand on that idea ? May be backed by evidence etc. 10 comments USTECH_WORKER Reply byoung2 2 days ago The recent batches all use the following formulas which I don't find particularly interesting: AI native ______ for _______ ______ for AI agents AI _______ for _______ https://www.ycombinator.com/companies?batch=Winter%202027&ba... dang 1 day ago Isn't that how every major tech wave works? "Thing, but for $X" is what everyone was doing when $X was personal computing, the web, mobile. AnimalMuppet 1 day ago Sure, but how many of those were YC-worthy? 5 replies → 4lx87 16 hours ago [flagged]
byoung2 2 days ago The recent batches all use the following formulas which I don't find particularly interesting: AI native ______ for _______ ______ for AI agents AI _______ for _______ https://www.ycombinator.com/companies?batch=Winter%202027&ba... dang 1 day ago Isn't that how every major tech wave works? "Thing, but for $X" is what everyone was doing when $X was personal computing, the web, mobile. AnimalMuppet 1 day ago Sure, but how many of those were YC-worthy? 5 replies → 4lx87 16 hours ago [flagged]
dang 1 day ago Isn't that how every major tech wave works? "Thing, but for $X" is what everyone was doing when $X was personal computing, the web, mobile. AnimalMuppet 1 day ago Sure, but how many of those were YC-worthy? 5 replies → 4lx87 16 hours ago [flagged]
The recent batches all use the following formulas which I don't find particularly interesting:
https://www.ycombinator.com/companies?batch=Winter%202027&ba...
Isn't that how every major tech wave works? "Thing, but for $X" is what everyone was doing when $X was personal computing, the web, mobile.
Sure, but how many of those were YC-worthy?
5 replies →
[flagged]