← Back to context Comment by jsnell 1 day ago That blog post is very clear about the maintainer having no access to Mythos. 2 comments jsnell Reply IsTom 21 hours ago Does that matter that somebody else ran it for him? jsnell 19 hours ago When it is explicitly an appeal to authority, and the basis for the authority is incorrect? Feels like it matters.And presumably the GP thought that saying the maintainer had access to Mythos made it a more compelling argument. Otherwise why even mention it?
IsTom 21 hours ago Does that matter that somebody else ran it for him? jsnell 19 hours ago When it is explicitly an appeal to authority, and the basis for the authority is incorrect? Feels like it matters.And presumably the GP thought that saying the maintainer had access to Mythos made it a more compelling argument. Otherwise why even mention it?
jsnell 19 hours ago When it is explicitly an appeal to authority, and the basis for the authority is incorrect? Feels like it matters.And presumably the GP thought that saying the maintainer had access to Mythos made it a more compelling argument. Otherwise why even mention it?
Does that matter that somebody else ran it for him?
When it is explicitly an appeal to authority, and the basis for the authority is incorrect? Feels like it matters.
And presumably the GP thought that saying the maintainer had access to Mythos made it a more compelling argument. Otherwise why even mention it?