Comment by ccamrobertson
3 hours ago
Agreed. Phrases like "journalists are currently gooning over OpenAI and Anthropic" really put me off. It's a poor attempt at modern muckraking; cheeky yet offering little substance.
3 hours ago
Agreed. Phrases like "journalists are currently gooning over OpenAI and Anthropic" really put me off. It's a poor attempt at modern muckraking; cheeky yet offering little substance.
He's just a Brit, writing in a style we write in. Sweary, comical, red-top. The Register did it for years.
I'm not a Brit, but I do enjoy British culture, including writing. I haven't been able to read any of Ed's rants to the end despite generally being on the cautious side towards LLMs
I don't think you know what "gooning" means. It's edgy Gen Z slang and has nothing to do with being British.
I didn't say it was. I'm just observing that his muckraking style is part of a very long British pundit tradition. Americans have never liked it — Intel got very upset about The Register's coverage of "the Itanic".
(And he's not Gen Z anyway is he; he's among the older millennials. He's appropriating it for muckraking purposes.)
Sure, but does that vibe invalidate the argument? What an odd time the middle of an argument is to be clutching pearls and worrying about prose quality.
Style and vibes notwithstanding, is there anything in your view that wrong with the argument itself? Could a better or more polite writer have convinced you with the same shape of logic?
1 reply →
This is why I’m glad we won our revolution against you guys all those years ago. I’m double glad that you all are reaping what you sowed after brexit.
There’s so much wrong with the UK, including its culture, its people, etc. it’s been a long time coming for it to finally feel the pain of its rot. This includes the “contributions” the UK has made to the arts.