← Back to context Comment by naturalmovement 7 days ago [flagged] 1 comment naturalmovement Reply cguess 7 days ago This one actually certainly is, it just hasn't shown up in court because no one's dumb enough to enforce it.The Constitutional Convention discussed a national language at length in 1789, and adamantly didn't include a language requirement on purpose.
cguess 7 days ago This one actually certainly is, it just hasn't shown up in court because no one's dumb enough to enforce it.The Constitutional Convention discussed a national language at length in 1789, and adamantly didn't include a language requirement on purpose.
This one actually certainly is, it just hasn't shown up in court because no one's dumb enough to enforce it.
The Constitutional Convention discussed a national language at length in 1789, and adamantly didn't include a language requirement on purpose.