← Back to context Comment by tjoff 6 days ago But sending sensitive private audio recordings to the lowest bidder is par for the course?https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-49502292 2 comments tjoff Reply silvandeboer 6 days ago This comment makes it sound like they sold private recordings to whomever was willing to pay for them, but they paid third parties to evaluate Siri recordings. tjoff 6 days ago Don't really agree with that, that would have been highest bidder if anything.And it wouldn't have been much worse compared to be as careless as they have been.
silvandeboer 6 days ago This comment makes it sound like they sold private recordings to whomever was willing to pay for them, but they paid third parties to evaluate Siri recordings. tjoff 6 days ago Don't really agree with that, that would have been highest bidder if anything.And it wouldn't have been much worse compared to be as careless as they have been.
tjoff 6 days ago Don't really agree with that, that would have been highest bidder if anything.And it wouldn't have been much worse compared to be as careless as they have been.
This comment makes it sound like they sold private recordings to whomever was willing to pay for them, but they paid third parties to evaluate Siri recordings.
Don't really agree with that, that would have been highest bidder if anything.
And it wouldn't have been much worse compared to be as careless as they have been.