← Back to context

Comment by freedomben

10 hours ago

Good post, but:

> A venerable web application pattern that has had a small modern renaissance thanks to Remix

Remix is not that popular. I don't think attributing this to remix is accurate. Next.js quite possibly.

The full context of that quote makes it clear that it's meant more as a wry joke:

> A venerable web application pattern that has had a small modern renaissance thanks to Remix, form submissions and redirects took a while to explain to my colleagues, on account of everyone being used to heavily client-side web applications.

(Although it's not really a joke, it's pretty amazing how many professional web developers these days don't know how to use forms without JavaScript.)

  • The opposite is why I'd never be a good web developer. I grew up messing around with PHP and if I spent the time to learn the modern stack, I'd constantly be thinking it's stupid.

    • I can relate to that.

      I recently had to intervene during the latest office holy war to explain that you don't need JS for file uploads.

      It was eye opening.

I think the author is suggesting that Remix was the inspiration for the renaissance, not that it's necessarily the most popular method for doing so.

I'd be curious to see the stats on how often Next.js users lean into the server component model that makes the frontend fast. My anecdotal experience is that it's an afterthought for many. By comparison, Astro (as mentioned by the author) makes you think about this stuff upfront via opt-in rather than opt-out. It's a wonderful framework.

I think Remix brought back interest in Form Actions and other meta frameworks took inspiration from that.

Remix has been nonetheless influential in the space, in the same way preact and signals have been.