← Back to context Comment by Robotbeat 5 days ago What if they just make a mistake, unintentionally? 3 comments Robotbeat Reply 12_throw_away 5 days ago Publishing lies that were generated by the plausible-lie-generating-machine is a very intentional action, it's not a "mistake".The legal profession uses the term "reckless disregard", see, e.g., [1].[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan Robotbeat 4 days ago It’s illegal to make factual errors. Wow, cool, I guess we solved science very easily! 12_throw_away 4 days ago Might I suggest that X.com - "the everything app" - would be a better fit for your unique rhetorical style?
12_throw_away 5 days ago Publishing lies that were generated by the plausible-lie-generating-machine is a very intentional action, it's not a "mistake".The legal profession uses the term "reckless disregard", see, e.g., [1].[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan Robotbeat 4 days ago It’s illegal to make factual errors. Wow, cool, I guess we solved science very easily! 12_throw_away 4 days ago Might I suggest that X.com - "the everything app" - would be a better fit for your unique rhetorical style?
Robotbeat 4 days ago It’s illegal to make factual errors. Wow, cool, I guess we solved science very easily! 12_throw_away 4 days ago Might I suggest that X.com - "the everything app" - would be a better fit for your unique rhetorical style?
12_throw_away 4 days ago Might I suggest that X.com - "the everything app" - would be a better fit for your unique rhetorical style?
Publishing lies that were generated by the plausible-lie-generating-machine is a very intentional action, it's not a "mistake".
The legal profession uses the term "reckless disregard", see, e.g., [1].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan
It’s illegal to make factual errors. Wow, cool, I guess we solved science very easily!
Might I suggest that X.com - "the everything app" - would be a better fit for your unique rhetorical style?