← Back to context Comment by hylaride 9 hours ago So to oversimplify, is the idea to bring an AWS Aurora-style storage mechanism natively to Postgres? 3 comments hylaride Reply levkk 9 hours ago Yes, except it doesn't have any cross-dependencies on the same volume, so the uptime here should be higher. jeremyjh 8 hours ago Aurora has a completely different storage backend. PgDog is a front end proxy - each server in the cluster is still using standard Postgres right? levkk 8 hours ago Yup!
levkk 9 hours ago Yes, except it doesn't have any cross-dependencies on the same volume, so the uptime here should be higher. jeremyjh 8 hours ago Aurora has a completely different storage backend. PgDog is a front end proxy - each server in the cluster is still using standard Postgres right? levkk 8 hours ago Yup!
jeremyjh 8 hours ago Aurora has a completely different storage backend. PgDog is a front end proxy - each server in the cluster is still using standard Postgres right? levkk 8 hours ago Yup!
Yes, except it doesn't have any cross-dependencies on the same volume, so the uptime here should be higher.
Aurora has a completely different storage backend. PgDog is a front end proxy - each server in the cluster is still using standard Postgres right?
Yup!