← Back to context Comment by hylaride 12 hours ago So to oversimplify, is the idea to bring an AWS Aurora-style storage mechanism natively to Postgres? 4 comments hylaride Reply inigyou 2 hours ago Aurora is one big database, isn't it? PgDog is just a proxy where you tell it which shard to access. levkk 12 hours ago Yes, except it doesn't have any cross-dependencies on the same volume, so the uptime here should be higher. jeremyjh 11 hours ago Aurora has a completely different storage backend. PgDog is a front end proxy - each server in the cluster is still using standard Postgres right? levkk 10 hours ago Yup!
inigyou 2 hours ago Aurora is one big database, isn't it? PgDog is just a proxy where you tell it which shard to access.
levkk 12 hours ago Yes, except it doesn't have any cross-dependencies on the same volume, so the uptime here should be higher. jeremyjh 11 hours ago Aurora has a completely different storage backend. PgDog is a front end proxy - each server in the cluster is still using standard Postgres right? levkk 10 hours ago Yup!
jeremyjh 11 hours ago Aurora has a completely different storage backend. PgDog is a front end proxy - each server in the cluster is still using standard Postgres right? levkk 10 hours ago Yup!
Aurora is one big database, isn't it? PgDog is just a proxy where you tell it which shard to access.
Yes, except it doesn't have any cross-dependencies on the same volume, so the uptime here should be higher.
Aurora has a completely different storage backend. PgDog is a front end proxy - each server in the cluster is still using standard Postgres right?
Yup!